Column: Pretext or just text?
Posted on 30 July 2010.
well, wat once started off as nbd has turned in2 quite the big phenomenon 2day.
w/ overused phrases such as LOL, OMG, and TTYL tht appeared to b foreign lang decades ago, hav now becme simple lingo tht mean thngs such as: “laugh out loud,” “oh my god,” and “talk to you later.” in fact, they r so overused tht it makes me ques if f2f comm. has completely lst all hope.
While at first glance this blurb is an English teacher’s worst nightmare (or in my case — my editor’s), if we stop to take a closer look, we can see that it is nothing more than an average texters’ ordinary vocabulary.
According to netlingo.com, more than 82 million people text on a regular basis, meaning there should be no reason for me to have to go back and iterate what was previously said above, because I’m sure these abbreviations are universal nowadays.
Although I have to admit to being quite an avid texter myself and am prone to using (some) of these common abbreviations, I can’t help but wonder if the texting phenomenon has gotten slightly out of control and ultimately strained face-to-face communication.
However, what has really gotten to me is how much more predominant text messaging is among any other type of communication — especially with the younger generation.
Teenagers and young adults are frequent texters. So frequent that I feel it is the only means of communication used among them, especially in more serious conversations typically handled face to face.
According to the June 2009 Nielsen report titled “How Teens Use Media,” U.S. mobile teens send on average 2,899 text-messages per month compared with 191 calls. These numbers have been on the increase, with the average number of texts rising by 566 percent in just the past two years.
What’s even more startling is that 66 percent of all U.S. teens say they actually prefer text messaging to calling, according to the same report, which leaves me questioning why this is.
Why do so many prefer to text rather than call? Or heaven forbid, have a conversation face-to-face?
See, I have this friend. We’ll just call her friend A. Now, friend A is one of the few under the age of 25 who frequently calls people to have conversation. Yes, I know what you’re thinking — but it’s true, there are still people out there who like to have conversations over the phone.
But anywise, friend A also has this friend, who, let’s just go ahead and call her friend B. One day I’m sitting with friend A as she gets a text from friend B that instantly gets her blood boiling. Upon receiving this text, friend A responds by calling friend B.
Now instead of doing the normal, mature thing, friend B —without hesitation — ignores friend A’s phone call, fully knowing that she is far from content.
This of course irritates friend A even more, because she knows darn well that friend B is sitting right next to her phone. When friend A cannot get a hold of friend B by calling her, she has no choice but to text a reply.
And surely enough, moments after sending the text, friend B responds almost immediately.
Now, as peeved as friend A was, it really got me thinking. Are there people out there who will go to the extent of ignoring a good friend’s call to avoid a more personal form of communication?
I will admit that I am one of the 66 percent who would rather answer a text than a phone call.
However, I would never go out of my way to escape a phone call to discuss an important issue.
As convenient as it may be to text, I feel a lot can be miscommunicated, because feelings and emotions are not always easily conveyed. I believe as much as technology is progressing, we still need to stop and find the time to get away from text messaging every single feeling, emotion, or problem we have and find more personal, face-to-face forms of communication.
Well, on tht note, I g2g, ttyl.
